On Sun, Aug 12, 2007 at 10:13:50PM +0330, Mohsen Saboorian wrote: > Salaam, > > Mohammed Sameer, Mohammad Adnène, is there still problems with the > package? Mohammad fixed all the issues you mentioned AFAIK, and I > think it should be ready for mentoring :) > > > ic. that's why. > > But why don't you release a source package ? ;-) > > There are very few users who need source code. It can be accessed via > CVS, and also through each binary package, and built with Ant file... > Anyway let's not continue on this one ;) I'm just curious: Why are you putting the code in the binary package if no one will use it ? > > > We cited WikiSources, but it was not an authentic source to them: > > > http://revu.tauware.de/details.py?upid=6237 (seems to be currently down) > > > > They are I guess. I just wanted to know why are they objecting ? who is WikiSources ? is that where > > you were handling the ubuntu packaging ? > > See: http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Talk:The_Holy_Qur'an#Copyright Will check it tomorrow. > > We are now depending on libxul and I was thinking that we can > > drop the dependency on one of the browsers. The point is I have > > no way to know if the browser support is enabled or not. > > if I purge iceape. > > Why? I have no clue on this. Is the current configuration buggy? Because you are creating and testing the package under ubuntu. The original one didn't work for me. I really wonder how will we be able to support the package and fix any bug ? I'm not doing that because I have no java knowledge. You might not do it because you are testing on ubuntu!!! -- GPG-Key: 0xA3FD0DF7 - 9F73 032E EAC9 F7AD 951F 280E CB66 8E29 A3FD 0DF7 Debian User and Developer. Homepage: www.foolab.org
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature