[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: again with lyx/latex
- To: General Arabization Discussion <general at arabeyes dot org>
- Subject: Re: again with lyx/latex
- From: Thamer Mahmoud <thamer at newkuwait dot org>
- Date: Thu, 06 Jan 2005 03:31:04 +0300
Munzir Taha writes:
> On Yaum al-Arbi'a 24 Thu al-Qi`dah 1425 4:10 pm, Thamer Mahmoud wrote:
> > Munzir Taha writes:
> > > On Yaum al-Ithnain 22 Thu al-Qi`dah 1425 7:04 pm, Yousef Raffah wrote:
> > > > I have read on different web sites including the Arabic LyX HowTo on
> > > > the documentation page about ArabTex, now is it required to have it in
> > > > order for me to write documents/books or whatsoever in Arabic?
> > >
> > > Yes.
> >
> > But it's non free. From the arabtex.faq:
> >
> > [ArabTeX] is free for scientific and strictly private, noncommercial
> > use. For commercial purposes you need a license agreement; inquire
> > at the author's address.
>
> If this is the case, how come it's distributed with all Free GNU/Linux
> distros?!
AFAIK, if the above quoted condition is still valid, than ArabTeX is
non-free in the sense that you are not free to *use* it for writing
commercial books or whatever. Distributing such a piece of software is
a different matter.
Restrictions like this render a software to be non-free because it
does not meat the conditions of being free software. For example, see
the DFSG (specifically item 6):
http://www.debian.org/social_contract#guidelines
>I feel as if this has changed during the project life cycle but
> they forgot to mention it ;)
>
This page mentions that debian considers this as non-free in woody:
http://packages.debian.org/stable/tex/arabtex
Not any more in Sarge:
http://packages.debian.org/testing/tex/arabtex
Perhaps this and other restrictions have been removed recently. If so,
such a clause in the FAQ need to be removed as well.
Regards,
Thamer Mahmoud