[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Pootle and similar tools
- To: Documentation and Translation <doc at arabeyes dot org>
- Subject: Re: Pootle and similar tools
- From: Youssef Chahibi <chahibi at gmail dot com>
- Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 13:32:16 +0000
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:from:to:subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:message-id; b=Ou0HTEwPvYFrmMLIZ+QKKQlqHYolQRTsLry2cdBFvCdym4hs50tRGS0Rm0tO7vMY+/o6cLnBYOsCDqf6JmvpqowcP9yYtAWfI6oKFqK58Lv59ZfP3loDsRo/TB/eqrxCXm4EoLfTRGh+GdnQ2HKpxnWh4mwsA80r5u9RfpD9/gc=
- User-agent: KMail/1.9.3
On Wednesday 26 July 2006 13:23, Djihed Afifi wrote:
> As I understand it pootle can be used to edit po files. I'm proposing
> using it to edit those .po files, not as a glossary or anything.
>
> Djihed
السلام عليكم
Afaik, Glossary support in pootle aims to add an embedded glossary in the web
page which suggests equivalents for terms that are in the string.
> I'm proposing
> using it to edit those .po files, not as a glossary or anything.
We need a server. But I think wiktionary or lvdict.sf.net would fit better
because it supports discussions.