[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Our Gnome CVS Structure
- To: Documentation and Translation <doc at arabeyes dot org>
- Subject: Re: Our Gnome CVS Structure
- From: Nadim Shaikli <shaikli at yahoo dot com>
- Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2006 15:21:36 -0700 (PDT)
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=EsLnwIP/zxACJf+YYJuqH+//xqrxPWQAF7QKYIldCRCKg/A0wshI2RTto3y8TVwlIJ+8wJklIAXgmJ2C3b5bWGTZeeb9x6XR9IprNCDQXnsaE3gAHyFtRCGC1BEbBd94m/0yvN95K8mC8B1c/iEAf+vT0r5giE3xhYKF1cawaOc= ;
--- Djihed Afifi <djihedlists at googlemail dot com> wrote:
> I think our Gnome CVS structure should be adapted to make it easy for
> the maintainer/translators to maintain the translations. Currently,
> the CVS contains translations for 2.14 directly under gnome. We should
> adapt a version friendly structure that maps directly with
> http://l10n-status.gnome.org , this way
>
> gnome/2.14
> gnome/2.16
> etc
> gnome/HEAD
>
> Branching each time Gnome branch their translation project.
We should only be working on 'HEAD' and as such we should only have the
files that pertain to HEAD on our CVS. I believe Arafat.M followed the
same structure (which is now simply dated).
In short, there is no need to keep old(er) data once its uploaded to the
mothership (ie. Gnome's repositories). So it sounds like we simply need
to sync-up to Gnome's HEAD files in earnest. If the decision is made to
work on what is beyond HEAD (a future release if such files exist) then
those files alone should be uploaded (keep in mind that we are very
short-handed and as such I don't think we can afford to work on multiple
versions of the same application).
Salam.
- Nadim
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com