[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [emacs-bidi] Re: emacs-bidi - funtional/ready, now what ?
- To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz at elta dot co dot il>
- Subject: Re: [emacs-bidi] Re: emacs-bidi - funtional/ready, now what ?
- From: Kamal Dalal <kamal+arabeyes at banoora dot net>
- Date: Sun, 9 Mar 2003 10:54:51 -0800
- Cc: alex at emacswiki dot org, ntakahas at m17n dot org, shaikli at yahoo dot com, developer at arabeyes dot org, emacs-bidi at gnu dot org
- User-agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
On Sun, Mar 09, 2003 at 06:09:07PM +0200, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
>
> I described several aspects of that implementation several times, but
> I don't know whether my explanations ``shed more light'' on it ;-)
Nope! Still dark ;)
> As I said several times here in the past, I'm uneasy about releasing
> unfinished code. I did say that I will gladly pass whatever I have to
> individuals who will demonstrate that they are determined to work on
> bidi Emacs.
I understand. Hope that person arrives really soon.
> Also, Windows inherently supports bidi, so it sounds like you don't
> need anything to have what you want.
Correct, but I'd rather not use Windows services to do bidi.
> Can you tell why do you think a sequential algorithm would be useful
> for a terminal?
A terminal receives characters on the wire as they arrive. I was
wondering whether an incremental approach to bidi would allow one to
apply it on the characters on the wire.
I know, an incremental bidi may turn out to be completely useless to
terminals, but I am still interested ;)
# Kamal