Re: Proposal for the Basis of a Codepoint ExtensiontoUnicodefortheEncoding of the Quranic Manuscripts

["Thomas Milo" <t dot milo at chello dot nl>]

Abdulhaq Lynch wrote:
> So the discussions using English linguistic terms is a closed book to
> me (I confess). But I don't see the need for them when encoding
> something designed to represent the Arabic concepts that I do know.

Fair enough, it's the concepts that count, not the language used to express
them. Eventually, if the results are going to enrich Unicode, they will
have to be made presentable in English.

t