[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Questions about yeh, hamzah on yeh, alef maksura and dotless ba
- To: General Arabization Discussion <general at arabeyes dot org>
- Subject: Re: Questions about yeh, hamzah on yeh, alef maksura and dotless ba
- From: Meor Ridzuan Meor Yahaya <meor dot ridzuan at gmail dot com>
- Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2006 13:45:03 +0800
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=jDFXZnY8ZKL0+zv58PBCFy9+5CJcjVlRQHbobYjqE3ARkqNFnDk166oKVDL/jn36rMYhj9/bJD6d6z3LznrJu71J0/1k+OnVnt1SKix8dppdcl/ZKvVMcV8FiE31XMAjrYrfy1NS2klXHGPeTVax6rU79DPqbW+5vmil3VIxIoc=
Nicholas,
I did encounter that title sometime ago, but from where I stay, it is
almost impossible to get a copy, unless I order online (which is not
cost efficient for me).
Anyway, how different it is form something like this
http://www.ymsite.com/books/Quran_Dictionary/Easy_Dictionary.htm ? I
think it is a good introduction, simple. It deos not attemp to use the
correct spelling as well. However, it suffers from one problem:
trouble with putting marks to Lam Alef. I think htis is due to lack of
good font support the comes with MS Windows. None can really support
marking lam alef correctly, as far as I know.
Regards.
On 12/31/05, heer <heer at u dot washington dot edu> wrote:
> Meor,
>
> With respect to indexing the Qur'an you might want to take a look
> at Muhammad Fu'ad `Abd al-Baqi's _al-Mu`jam al-Mufahras li-Alfaz al-Qur'an
> al-Karim_. It was first published by Dar al-Kutub in Cairo in 1945, but
> has been reprinted many times since then. Notice that the author makes no
> attempt to represent the spelling found in a mushaf. Everything is
> printed in a modern Arabic font, and, in accordance with Egyptian style,
> final ya's are without dots.
>
> Nicholas
>