[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Is X lam-alef key OK?
- To: General Arabization Discussion <general at arabeyes dot org>, pflm52td at w6 dot dion dot ne dot jp
- Subject: Re: Is X lam-alef key OK?
- From: Arafat Medini <arafato at gmail dot com>
- Date: Sat, 27 Aug 2005 16:40:48 +0200
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=sqLZp8dGTPbleWJdwV7h2UdZG0kbC4RL0Egs1PFTEvYLBXq+THIfEGnXXMEC0b6VEiBEMGnan224nkbBqYCzICU9GalU04bDHbR+g676rZJAAdHtFfGj9qA4XDUxLRWJEVFM0e0U+lOMBaNQGtefFBKqbNrHObQV9SHfKm7YYh8=
Hajimemashite,
Please write your name and family name! That's very important for us!
if you're speaking about the lam_aleph as two chars then the bug got
ireoned out, I don't get any problem and have one char lam_aleph, if
you get two chars lam + aleph then it is a problem indeed.
If you're not happy with the script ;) then simply change the font,
some fonts display the "normal" lam_aleph and others display a lam +
alpeh but xkb recognizes them as one char.
is it usual? yes it totally us, as said it's only a question of
script, nothing more nothing less. Still if xkb writes down two chars
then you have problem, else it's a matter of taste.
nihonjin ha arabiago suki deshou!
arabeyes e youkoso! arabiago de tanoshinde kudasai! :)
jya!
Arafato
p.s: trans: Japanese seem to like Arabic
welcome at arabeyes and have fun with the Arabic language!