[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: xkb keyboard layout vs. input methods im-chooser
- To: developer at arabeyes dot org
- Subject: Re: xkb keyboard layout vs. input methods im-chooser
- From: TAKAHASHI Naoto <ntakahas at m17n dot org>
- Date: Thu, 15 May 2008 19:53:05 +0900
- Cc: developer at arabeyes dot org
- User-agent: SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya) FLIM/1.14.2 (Yagi-Nishiguchi) APEL/10.2 Emacs/21.4 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI)
"Muayyad AlSadi" writes:
> if x does not support assigning multi charts to a key
> will does im/scim/...etc. have this problem
You can input laam+alef with the B key if you use scim-m17n. I have
written the code more than three years ago.
> because Arabic layout is much simpler that Japanese Layout
Yes, I guarantee the statement above. :-)
--
TAKAHASHI Naoto
ntakahas at m17n dot org
http://www.m17n.org/ntakahas/