[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Arabbix again and again.



On Wed, Mar 09, 2005 at 07:12:57PM +0100, Youcef Rabah Rahal wrote:
> On Wed, 9 Mar 2005 20:04:04 +0200, Mohammed Sameer <msameer at foolab dot org> wrote:
> 
> > well, I did a commit next day, But this didn't prevent the account from being deactivated.
> 
> Hmm, strange. I would be be interested to know how the status became
> 'active' again.
>  
I really don't know. One must look at the logs to know and I don't have access to them.

> > This is not related to the main topic, Why do we inactivate the CVSaccounts ? I can understand if they are affecting the server performance and/or they huge turning the life of the admin maintaining it into hell!
> > And I don't think that any of the 2 things apply here.
> 
> This is totally decorrelated from the CVS commit rights. IUt is just a
> way to _automatically tag_ inactive accounts!
> 

And why have inactive accounts from the beginning !!!

-- 
----------------
-- Katoob Main Developer, Arabbix Maintainer.
GNU/Linux registered user #224950
Proud Egyptian GNU/Linux User Group <www.eglug.org> Admin.
Life powered by Debian, Homepage: www.foolab.org
--
Don't send me any attachment in Micro$oft (.DOC, .PPT) format please
Read http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html
Preferable attachments: .PDF, .HTML, .TXT
Thanx for adding this text to Your signature

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature