[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Developer Digest, Vol 13, Issue 17
- To: developer at arabeyes dot org
- Subject: Re: Developer Digest, Vol 13, Issue 17
- From: "Dr.Dre" <pharon at gmail dot com>
- Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2005 22:16:58 +0200
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=U1a2WeVyHuLpN3X87kgCI9P9zNY0sJIG+t4u7/izvumZ4VlBVB7Oxwzo6+BkDKpUC1TjGtN4fXNOM+qPfoXApvUAKqMlvdwf2jaxbUsTAFcN7djSm1puDcfIerDk5pJDgZd28ontWjfwWPVrzpFP8qRltOtnCKgAFufeKaSMOZ4=
Well in my experience, images can be made on any distro similar to the
one on the liveCD, as long as it's as recent ( gcc/glibc ).
Also library dependency should be filled in, if your module needs a
library not included on the livecd then you'll have to include it in
the module.
This procedure needs to be tested and confirmed, but wouldn't it be
more consistent if we everyone used the same base to build stuff?
Well not to be outdone, here's another debian based minimal liveCD we
can use. I had close contact with its developer (another one man
team):
http://www.deadcd.org/
Also why not slax ? it's minimal and uses linux-live, I also had some
contact with its maintainer ( check the forums ). Another one man
project:
http://slax.linux-live.org
Hey btw wasn't slackware a one project in its beginnings?