[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: arabbix discussion

On Thu, Jan 20, 2005 at 11:33:58PM +0400, Mohammed Elzubeir wrote:
> On Thu, 2005-01-20 at 11:12 -0800, Nadim Shaikli wrote:
> > --- Alaa Abd El Fattah <alaa at eglug dot org> wrote:
> > > On Thu, 20 Jan 2005 "Dr.Dre" wrote:
> >                       ^^^^^^^^
> > It would be best to use real names if possible, but I digress ;-)
> > 
> Use whatever name you want, there is no mailing-list policy or rule that
> says you have to use any particular name format (and none would likely
> ever exist).
> > We need to keep the focus of what Arabbix is meant to be and why it even
> > exists.  The process and the documentation (steps, procedures, recipes,
> > etc) are more important, IMHO, than the end-product.  We also want to
> > come-up with something that can easily serve other entities (LUGs, orgs,
> > etc) by having them __very__ easily customize it to fir their needs and
> > their themes.  Last but not least, it needs to be debian based.
> > 
> Right. I don't think Debian is a _requirement_ but I most certainly
> prefer to have it Debian-based. 
> From rom what I am understanding, linux-live scripts may be a way to go. If
> it requires more work, so be it. Count me in for any work that needs to
> be done if it goes in that direction.

What about the hardware detection ?
We can get the hardware scripts from knoppix, But then, Do we have enough resources to maintain it ? Knoppix won't support us then.

-- Katoob Main Developer, Arabbix Maintainer.
GNU/Linux registered user #224950
Proud Egyptian GNU/Linux User Group <www.eglug.org> Admin.
Life powered by Debian, Homepage: www.foolab.org
Don't send me any attachment in Micro$oft (.DOC, .PPT) format please
Read http://www.fsf.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html
Preferable attachments: .PDF, .HTML, .TXT
Thanx for adding this text to Your signature

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature