[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: arabbix discussion

On Thu, Jan 20, 2005 at 11:12:26AM -0800, Nadim Shaikli wrote:
> --- Alaa Abd El Fattah <alaa at eglug dot org> wrote:
> > On Thu, 20 Jan 2005 "Dr.Dre" wrote:
>                       ^^^^^^^^
> It would be best to use real names if possible, but I digress ;-)

> > simply let arabbix be a snapshot of phaeronix that includes arabic
> > locale, the rest of arabeyes projects and arabeyes artwork.
> > 
> > I'm sure I can pressure islam to put most of the stuff in core phaeronix
> > anyway.
> We need to keep the focus of what Arabbix is meant to be and why it even
> exists.  The process and the documentation (steps, procedures, recipes,
> etc) are more important, IMHO, than the end-product.  We also want to
> come-up with something that can easily serve other entities (LUGs, orgs,
> etc) by having them __very__ easily customize it to fir their needs and
> their themes.  Last but not least, it needs to be debian based.
> No harm in restating an abbreviated set of goals every once in awhile :-)

I agree here,
But the only modular debian based live CD out there is morphix, Which seems dead to me.

ubuntu and gnoppix are not modular.
knoppix is not modular.

suggestions ?

-- Katoob Main Developer, Arabbix Maintainer.
GNU/Linux registered user #224950
Proud Egyptian GNU/Linux User Group <www.eglug.org> Admin.
Life powered by Debian, Homepage: www.foolab.org
Don't send me any attachment in Micro$oft (.DOC, .PPT) format please
Read http://www.fsf.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html
Preferable attachments: .PDF, .HTML, .TXT
Thanx for adding this text to Your signature

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature