[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: PuTTY Bidi - final points
- To: Development Discussions <developer at arabeyes dot org>
- Subject: Re: PuTTY Bidi - final points
- From: Nadim Shaikli <shaikli at yahoo dot com>
- Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2004 18:19:41 -0800 (PST)
- Cc: putty at projects dot tartarus dot org
--- Muhammad Alkarouri <malkarouri at yahoo dot co dot uk> wrote:
> On Wed, 2004-03-10 at 19:42, Nadim Shaikli wrote:
> > --- Simon Tatham wrote:
> > >
> > > I'm unconvinced about this, I'm afraid. That promotion clause looks
> > > horribly like a GPL incompatibility to me, and one reason I like the
> > > MIT licence is that it's fully GPL-compatible.
> Short answer, no need. It _is_ GPL-compatible, as stated by the FSF
> I am not related to ICU/IBM/FSF/etc, but I would like to draw your
> attention to the fact that this is exactly the X11 license explicitly
> mentioned by FSF as GPL compatible under the name 'The X11 License'. See
> http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/license-list.html#GPLCompatibleLicenses .
Simon, so can we use it, can we, can we, can we ? :-)
If that doesn't covey our enthusiasm to get this issue
resolved I'm not sure what will :-)
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Search - Find what you’re looking for faster