[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Bidi-less Applications Patching Policy
- To: Development Discussions <developer at arabeyes dot org>
- Subject: Re: Bidi-less Applications Patching Policy
- From: Youcef Rabah Rahal <rahal at arabeyes dot org>
- Date: Tue, 1 Jun 2004 21:24:57 +0200
- Organization: Arabeyes
- User-agent: KMail/1.5.3
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Salam,
On Tuesday 01 June 2004 20:48, Muhammad Alkarouri wrote:
> First of all, I am not resentful of the Core committee. Not on the
> existence nor in the principle that it should be small. Two points, though:
>
> - Core does not exist to stifle discussions. By the way I don't attribute
> it to all core members, only some of them display this attitude.
I'm not aware of any.
> - Second thing is that other members and member opinions are useful
> resources for Core. I expect to be able to say my opinion (with no
> exaggeration/nagging) and then core can decide what is best for Arabeyes.
> Not discovering a problem, thinking about it themselves, solving it, and
> then passing it for us to implement.
I have never seen that (if any, then it was not on purpose). If there have
been such mistakes then we'll be glad that you point them in a constructive
and productive manner: 'You guys are wrong because this and that and you
should fix it quickly' and not by telling 'I'm leaving and/because Arabeyes
is not supporting OSS'.
> --- Mohammed Elzubeir <elzubeir at arabeyes dot org> wrote:
> > Well, allow me to remind you then ;) Seriously, Core is completely
> > pointless if there are people (again, the keyword here is sizeable,
> > since someone, somewhere, always will nto be happy bout something)., who
> > are completely unhappy with their decisions.
>
> And people are completely pointless if core is to use its brain muscles
> without others help (see above).
... ?!
Read below.
[...]
> > We have tried to contact the "authorities" and still to no avail. This
> > is an on-going challenge and we are all aware of it.
>
> While you are doing that, do the things that you can. Use available
> dictionaries technical and otherwise. How much does an ALESCO dictionary
> cost, by the way?
Please do some checks before you make such a statement.
1- I _did_ buy an ALECSO dictionary, with money from my own pocket. [And it
was sent from Tunisia to France, so I had to pay the posting too ;)]. Who
said volunteering was costless ? ;)
2- Read the QAC agenda for next meeting (Wiki). I personally added the point
to discuss the reference to ALECSO standards. Oh, and you can check that the
modification date is not today's ;) I did the change one or two days ago,
after _your_ post to 'doc'. Who said 'core' did not take account of 'other's'
opinion.
Come on...
- --
Youcef R. Rahal
Arabeyes.org
http://www.arabeyes.org/~rahal
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFAvNgJHDRR6Cd0eSYRAoWvAJ4zJ3L5NN/IgulGTNIO9m0eR54pPgCaAkKA
iYhWwpOfqkxEUdnVd2x0PTU=
=hXdx
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----