[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: ITL + autotools ?



On Mon, Aug 30, 2004 at 11:18:22AM -0700, Nadim Shaikli wrote:
> --- Mohammed Sameer <uniball at gmx dot net> wrote:
> > Is there a plan to use autoconf, automake, libtool properly for ITL ?
> > If so, I think that I can give a hand,
> 
> Mohammed, what is there now is sufficient (ie. it all works) and its
> rather light-weight.  It would be best to keep it as is and to simply
> add the necessary "fluff" to be able to generate .deb files.
> 
> Thanks & Salam.

If the aim is to only create a debian  package, then a patch that gets applied to the source while building the deb is enough and there'll be no need to touch the current things, However I thought that the aim is to *adjust* the current implementation ;)

-- 
----------------
-- Katoob Main Developer
Linux registered user #224950, ICQ #58475622
--
Don't send me any attachment in Micro$oft (.DOC, .PPT) format please
Read http://www.fsf.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html
Preferable attachments: .PDF, .HTML, .TXT
Thanx for adding this text to Your signature
--
-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.1
GCM/IT d-(++)@ s+(++):->+++ a-- C+++$>++++ UL+++$>++++ P+++$>+++++
L+++(++++)$>+++++ E>+++ W++?>$ N+>+++ o? K-? !w++ !O !M !V !PS@ !PE@ Y+ PGP=+++
t? 5? !X R? tv-- b+@ DI D+ G-- e++>+++ h-->++ !r y?
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature