On Mon, Aug 30, 2004 at 11:18:22AM -0700, Nadim Shaikli wrote: > --- Mohammed Sameer <uniball at gmx dot net> wrote: > > Is there a plan to use autoconf, automake, libtool properly for ITL ? > > If so, I think that I can give a hand, > > Mohammed, what is there now is sufficient (ie. it all works) and its > rather light-weight. It would be best to keep it as is and to simply > add the necessary "fluff" to be able to generate .deb files. > > Thanks & Salam. If the aim is to only create a debian package, then a patch that gets applied to the source while building the deb is enough and there'll be no need to touch the current things, However I thought that the aim is to *adjust* the current implementation ;) -- ---------------- -- Katoob Main Developer Linux registered user #224950, ICQ #58475622 -- Don't send me any attachment in Micro$oft (.DOC, .PPT) format please Read http://www.fsf.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html Preferable attachments: .PDF, .HTML, .TXT Thanx for adding this text to Your signature -- -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----- Version: 3.1 GCM/IT d-(++)@ s+(++):->+++ a-- C+++$>++++ UL+++$>++++ P+++$>+++++ L+++(++++)$>+++++ E>+++ W++?>$ N+>+++ o? K-? !w++ !O !M !V !PS@ !PE@ Y+ PGP=+++ t? 5? !X R? tv-- b+@ DI D+ G-- e++>+++ h-->++ !r y? ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature