Re: Re: Re: Arabic vim patch

["Antoine J. Mechelynck" <antoine dot mechelynck at belgacom dot net>]

digitect at mindspring dot com wrote:
[...]
> Tony, you're sure patch 303 causes the problem? Our straight 6.1.320+
> binary fails for you? (Remember our page has two .320 binaries--one
> with the Arabic patch and one without.) I'm not experiencing any
> difficulties here on WinXP with 303, so I'd just like to make sure.
>
> --
> Steve Hall  [ <digitect>AT<mindspring>DOT<com> ]

Yes I am. On my W98SE system (release 4.10.2222), the 6.1.300 +w32 +ole
+arabic and the 6.1.320 -p303 +w32 +ole +arabic binaries of gvim display
Arabic glyphs, the others (6.1.320 +p303, +arabic or -arabic) don't. Loaded
from identical .BAT and .PIF with identical vimrc, gvimrc and other scripts,
to view the identical test_doc_ar_utf8.txt, modified by me but only by
adding a BOM and setting its ends-of-lines to DOS style. Only the executable
name was modified, and not even that between 6.1.320 +arabic +p303 or -p303
(to test the -p303 I overwrote the +p303 +arabic with it).

Best regards,
Tony.