Re: Prayertime autotools (again)

[Nadim Shaikli <shaikli at yahoo dot com>]

--- Samy Al Bahra <samy at kerneled dot com> wrote:
> On Thu, 25 Dec 2003 16:29:10 +0300
> Thamer Mahmoud <neokuwait at hotmail dot com> wrote:
> > Of course this still up for debate. There are two paths to choose
> > from:
> > 
> > 1- I revert the changes to the old working code and we continue
> >    updating the Makefile.in as necessary. As the library grows and
> >    changes, Makefile.in editing might become more and more a time
> >    wasting and a boring task for everyone.
> 
> I vote for one. After a merge with hijri and other ITL components we
> will not be building upon the same build framework, we will write one
> streamlined for this collaboration of projects. Since we are looking at
> small individual projects though, it is probable that a bunch of
> Makefile targets to the current build framework will be more than
> enough.

I agree with Samy -- I would very much rather have Samy's previous setup
reinstated due to simplicity, directness and efficiency.  I will be taking
the same approach on the hijri code soon.

Salam.

 - Nadim


__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Protect your identity with Yahoo! Mail AddressGuard
http://antispam.yahoo.com/whatsnewfree