[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Tanween variants and Unicode
- To: General Arabization Discussion <general at arabeyes dot org>
- Subject: Re: Tanween variants and Unicode
- From: Meor Ridzuan Meor Yahaya <meor dot ridzuan at gmail dot com>
- Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2005 11:25:05 +0800
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=T/KMiGUqWITtPRtJKoZPVTawf16icgBH21/5tKvFNr4X1wfTTq5b6OzIZcT0LLeP+4ue0Q+b+mEW+6etUQnTzbLAkVH1e+G8v+rsSP1K01X6JlvponD7Bx8hQPZp02GiHc1x5lONFrqAErPtHwheXWIvX6dOT3Iu2Ssq2iqbeX0=
I think as far as tanween is concern, that's about it. Of course, this
only considering it's visual appearance according to the madinah
mushaf ( not the whole tajweed rule)
Any new projects?
On 8/20/05, Mete Kural <metek at touchtonecorp dot com> wrote:
> Salaam Abdulhaq, Meor and all,
>
> I wanted to ask you to refresh my memory on something we discussed about in the discussions.
>
> As far as I remember we had decided that these tanweens are not currently supported in Unicode:
>
> - tanween with a meem/tamweem/?
> - sequential tanween/silent tanween/?
>
> Were there any other tanweens that are currently not supported by Unicode?
>
> Thank you,
> Mete
>
> --
> Mete Kural
> Touchtone Corporation
> 714-755-2810
> --
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> General mailing list
> General at arabeyes dot org
> http://lists.arabeyes.org/mailman/listinfo/general
>