[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Sequential Fathatan Final Form (Items 9 and 10)
- To: General Arabization Discussion <general at arabeyes dot org>
- Subject: Re: Sequential Fathatan Final Form (Items 9 and 10)
- From: Mohammed Yousif <mhdyousif at gmx dot net>
- Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2004 09:24:38 +0300
- User-agent: KMail/1.6.1
On Thursday 17 June 2004 08:51, Thomas Milo wrote:
> Hi Mohammed,
>
> My previous reaction belongs in this section. Here it is again, with a
> small
>
> supplement:
>
> Sheikh Ali Gomaa is the Mufti of Egypt.
> http://weekly.ahram.org.eg/2001/561/profile.htm
>
That's interesting, although the name Ali Gomaa seems familiar but in 2001
I think it was someone else
but certainly he is not the Mufti now.
> He is also the general editor of the Encyclopaedia of Hadith, part of the
> Sunna Project of the Thesaurus Islamicus Foundation for which DecoType made
> an electronic version of the metal font used for the orginal 1924 Cairo
> Qur'an.
>
> > So my suggestion is to always make sure that you really got what you
>
> were
>
> > looking for not what was suggested by a single vendor.
>
> I consider the Qur'an as cultural legacy shared through time and space by a
> significant part of humanity, not as the latest version of a commercial
> product.
>
Whatever you consider it, it's still a religious text and these things are
very sensitive.
Why would you want the "last version"?
Well, let's say that printing X passed certification and after that an error
has been discovered. Al-Azhar in these cases invalidates the certification
and corrects the error.
It's clear then that if you get a mushaf from a non-Islamic body, you are
risking too much.
But if you are not willing to do that, then at least you should contact the
organization that certified it to make sure that the certification is valid.
> > btw: Al-Azhar has really very weak policies regarding computer
>
> technologies,
>
> > so this cooperation is probably weak too.
>
> Indeed, therefore it is not necessary to keep referring to /al-azhar_ (in
> reversible transcription) in our disputes. After all we are working on an
> analysis of the problem in terms of logical and visual aspects, not on a
> /fatwae/ about it.
>
Of course but when it comes to getting a new mushaf, you should be
contacting an Islamic body for the reason above.
> What I need to see is scans of authorized Qur'anic text that shows fathatan
> on top of alif.
>
okay.
--
Mohammed Yousif
Egypt