[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Wordlist License
- To: "Documentation and Translation" <doc at arabeyes dot org>
- Subject: Re: Wordlist License
- From: "Anas R." <anas dot linuxfuture at gmail dot com>
- Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2007 19:36:20 +0200
- Dkim-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:date:from:to:subject:x-mailer:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:message-id; b=E4pkgxIBQP9bBqc6PiyKrC4DhoWna2vtkCgkVcTiexOysiEHgL+J77HcZv5BwfwZ6Iug73+N6T8jiSTcJ1nLXyVx8XGk87J38E729mSHaCnTOXenRsi+fRm7BcVrggxBw5XNU8342xJKrlFKF7xbVaMBIeSMGfk9OkruDkC4i/M=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:date:from:to:subject:x-mailer:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:message-id; b=C/po5RDo6Jo1HOG11aPsdkROgQJ7T2RI+Yo248vI0wWXv0f6K2S+QTKaxn+nWG2TU/IamHwrYsOjU+4Ft6PDcBVa22M9Jrhtl75Y7o2VRt8UNYLKGGkzrIZsLyrEsN8yWd9RX5/b0z73OCqEiBYahkSCJ4hssBN7myDRzMWSPj8=
I don't think that FDL is good for dictionaries... it seems like we need sort of FDL+LGPL licence.
Best regards,
- Anas R.
======= At 2007-03-02, 18:32:03 you wrote: =======
>On Fri, Mar 02, 2007, Michelle Konzack wrote:
>> GFDL is not realy a goo choice because it prefent the WordList
>> to enter Debian because the GNU Free Documentation Licemse is
>> considered as NON-DFSG-FREE.
>
>Nope. GFDL with invariant sections is not DFSG-free.
>
>Here, we are chosing GFDL without any invariant section, with no back
>and no front cover.
>
>--
>Mohammed Adnène Trojette
>
>_______________________________________________
>Doc mailing list
>Doc at arabeyes dot org
>http://lists.arabeyes.org/mailman/listinfo/doc
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =