[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: working on firefox po's
- To: Documentation and Translation <doc at arabeyes dot org>
- Subject: Re: working on firefox po's
- From: Ayman Hourieh <aymanh at gmail dot com>
- Date: Sun, 31 Oct 2004 19:22:17 +0200
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=CFRdfBwna/HEnWiyAlvqj6ZoFsJ11HNqBvuBRvKiaGPQZLbvTq+4rc1ghxk/Z61vBwcyhE+7qFodqtejq/XyCCGv7uOG+Q67CFILdYTRxzV7/BnD/guFqzte9aa7zvXxf06kGZnIXgFYuUrR7lpaQPM97k8HXcUKpg+Pmt11Qo8=
I agree, mozilla.org products should go under translate/mozilla in my
opinion, Firefox, Thunderbird, Mozilla Suite...
We can move what is currently under translate/mozilla (except for
firefox/ and *.sql) to translate/mozilla/suite, but first give me some
time to see how to make use of them, as they are .dtd files and not
.po's, and they are quite old (more than a year).
Let us first work on Firefox 1.0, when it's done, we can see how to
organize the project's CVS.
Ayman
On Sun, 31 Oct 2004 08:38:40 -0800 (PST), Nadim Shaikli
<shaikli at yahoo dot com> wrote:
>
> I don't think we should do that. Mozilla's CVS tree now is fine, the
> older .sql files have no meaning to anyone but to Mr. Twaijry and he's
> no longer active and/or responding to any emails as such I'm all for
> completely removing (or archiving) them. Keep in mind also that the
> mozilla effort could also extend to translating 'Thunderbird' (their
> email client) as well as the nasty :-) Bugzilla, etc.
>
> In all, I think what we have no is fine and the old/deprecated files
> need to be moved out of the way to lessen any confusion.
>
> Salam.
>
> - Nadim
>