[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Arabic in FC2 ?
- To: Documentation and Translation <doc at arabeyes dot org>
- Subject: Re: Arabic in FC2 ?
- From: Youcef Rabah Rahal <rahal at arabeyes dot org>
- Date: Mon, 3 May 2004 09:55:02 +0200
- Organization: Arabeyes
- User-agent: KMail/1.5.3
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Salam,
On Monday 03 May 2004 01:39, Ossama Khayat wrote:
[...]
> Have any one noticed the reply in here:
> http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-trans-list/2004-May/msg00009.html
It was CCed to 'doc'. So it will make it through as soon as Nadim lets it pass
:-)
You can also follow the bug report here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=122228
And add your comments if need be.
> -- QUOTE --
> Unfortunately, not, at least not from an installer point of view.
> Adding a language to the installer requires the addition of strings to
> support that language (ie, it would add the string "Arabic" which would
> then need to be translated into every other language).
> -- QUOTE --
>
> Just a note: Persian (Farsi) language is in Anaconda and it _IS_
> right-to-left and maybe the same font can be used for Arabic, or any of the
> others in KACST* set.
> Also, we can _easily_ translate the word Arabic to all the other languages
> using any of the many many available dictionaries/translation service on
> the net.
>
> Just my 2c.
It's not really a font problem. It's a schedule one. I personally understand
their point of view. I said that a week ago and then thought that maybe the
accomplishment would make them consider adding Arabic. Obviously not, so what
else can we do ?
Regards,
- --
Youcef R. Rahal
Arabeyes.org
http://www.arabeyes.org/~rahal
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFAlfrWHDRR6Cd0eSYRAhl/AKDdEJycPzZl8x9QFvyZB+agXJZ9sgCfdiLn
9dLhte4jB+nqhnxgkzCV4XE=
=BECq
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----