Re: [Fwd: New GNOME 2.8 "proposed" section]

[Arafat Medini <lumina at silverpen dot de>]

كنت أمزح يا رجل، إذا كنت قد مللت من إفليوشن يمكنك إرسال الملف لي، 350
سطرا ليست بالكثيرة.

عرفات

Am Mi, den 02.06.2004 um 13:27 Uhr -0700 schrieb Abdulaziz Al-Arfaj:
>  
>   !    
>    350 .    
>       
> .    
>      gal 
>    .  
>        
>    .   
>        
>   .
> 
>       
> .      ( 
> ).        
> .
> 
> 
> 
> --- Arafat Medini <lumina at silverpen dot de> wrote:
> >    !!!
> > 
> > 
> > 
> 
> > ATTACHMENT part 2 message/rfc822 
> > From: Christian Rose <menthos at gnome dot org>
> > To: GNOME I18N List <gnome-i18n at gnome dot org>
> > Date: Wed, 02 Jun 2004 11:40:34 +0200
> > CC: Carlos Perell_Marn <carlos at gnome dot org>
> > Subject: New GNOME 2.8 "proposed" section
> > 
> > I've added a new section on the GNOME 2.8 status pages: "proposed". It
> > should show up as soon as the translation status pages update.
> > 
> > This section will contain most new modules that so far have been
> > proposed for inclusion in GNOME 2.8, so as to make it easier for
> > translators to see which ones they are, what the translation status is
> > for them, and to make it easy to start translating them. Currently the
> > proposed section contains:
> > 
> >         evolution
> >         evolution-data-server
> >         evolution-exchange
> >         evolution-webcal
> >         gal
> >         gnome-nettool
> >         gtkhtml
> > 
> > Please note though that these modules have only been *proposed* for
> > inclusion. There is currently a module proposal period where new
> > software modules for GNOME 2.8 can be proposed by their authors (see the
> > time schedule on http://www.gnome.org/start/2.7/).
> > 
> > This means that these proposed modules are *not* officially included in
> > GNOME 2.8 yet. Some of them may be, and some of them may be not. We
> > don't know until the module decisions are final. I'm stressing this
> > point as you should know that translation work spent on these modules
> > *may* not be used for GNOME 2.8. On the other hand, there is a
> > potentially large chance that they will be, and the earlier you start
> > translating these modules, the better your chances probably are to have
> > a 100% supported translation the day GNOME 2.8 is finally released.
> > 
> > In other words: What you should translate if you want to maximize your
> > chances of having a 100% complete translation the day GNOME 2.8 is
> > finally released is at the moment the "developer-libs", "desktop" and
> > "proposed" sections of the translation status pages.
> > 
> > Some more things to notice: The proposals period has just started. More
> > proposals are likely to come, and some may be withdrawn. Thus, the
> > proposed section is likely to change further.
> > Also, the proposals section is only a temporary measure. As soon as the
> > proposals period is over and the module decisions are done, the modules
> > that will be included will be moved to the desktop and developer-libs
> > sections respectively, while the ones that will not be included will be
> > moved back to the other sections (like "extras") where they were before.
> > 
> > Also, as most authors and developers of the proposed modules are not
> > subscribed to this list, *please* direct all non-translation-related
> > comments about these modules to the proper place, either
> > http://bugzilla.gnome.org/ (if these comments are in fact bug reports)
> > or the desktop-devel-list at gnome dot org
> > (http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list) if they're
> > just comments on the merits and drawbacks of having these modules
> > included or not.
> [snip...snip]
> 
> 
> 	
> 		
> __________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Friends.  Fun.  Try the all-new Yahoo! Messenger.
> http://messenger.yahoo.com/ 
> _______________________________________________
> Doc mailing list
> Doc at arabeyes dot org
> http://lists.arabeyes.org/mailman/listinfo/doc
>