[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: masdar or fi3l amr
- To: Documentation and Translation <doc at arabeyes dot org>
- Subject: Re: masdar or fi3l amr
- From: Arafat Medini <lumina at silverpen dot de>
- Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2004 23:10:05 +0100
I totally agree with you here I said in a previous mail let the logic
say what it wants I am not against anything, the point is simply what do
99% of computer users think? And how would be the best way to serv them?
For me it's only doing the "right" thing in the eyes of the user, FOR ME
it's totally uninsteresting to use masdar or fi3l amr. For me the most
intresting is : what is best for the user?
my 2 euro cents...
Arafat
Am So, 2004-02-22 um 23.14 schrieb Ossama Khayat:
> --- Arafat Medini <lumina at silverpen dot de> wrote:
> > Salam,
> >
> > I had a disucssion with some other ppl about this
> > problem and their
> > reaction was identical to that of my sister: the pc
> > asks THEM to make
> > the action!
>
> Maybe you (and they) are right, but again the logic is
> that THEY ask the PC to do something, and not the
> other way. I mean, when I choose File -> Open... I'm
> telling the PC (application) to open the file for me,
> isn't it?
>
> > When asking them at the end of my little test about
> > which is more
> > confortable and less irritating, their answer (All)
> > was the masdar. So
> > I'll be the hardliner here and I'll stick with
> > masdar ;)
>
> I believe that I they got used to M$ Arabic, then
> they'll feel more confortable with Masdar as it's the
> use way, but I believe that in 95% of the cases, 'Fi3l
> Amr' would be more logical.
>
> My 2c...
>
> Ossama
>
> __________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Mail SpamGuard - Read only the mail you want.
> http://antispam.yahoo.com/tools
> _______________________________________________
> Doc mailing list
> Doc at arabeyes dot org
> http://lists.arabeyes.org/mailman/listinfo/doc
>