On Tue, 2004-12-28 at 09:08 -0800, Nadim Shaikli wrote: > Ah... I don't think this is something we ought to do and most certainly > not _now_. I highly suggest you take this up with 'core' to further > clarify the matter. I know alot has been said and there are raw nerves > maybe on both ends and to be completely honest and frank 99.9% of what > I read is shear silly and sophomoric at best. > Not quite. There is no 'formal' agreement to begin with. So, I don't see why Core should intervene in such an internal subject -- unless Core plans to make it a habit of getting involved in the maintainership of each project Arabeyes hosts. > I think we are all in this "boat" and this was noted many times before. > Having an established agreement with a said entity does preclude one > from simply changing their mind midstream - again, we are a professional > group who would like to uphold professional conduct. If there is a > change of heart then this topic needs to be brought-up in the context > of a defined deadline (ie. "the policy will change starting with 3.3 > release" or similar) to have a rational open debate about the topic. > You are right. I think it would fair to say, once this whole KACST thing is done with (whenever that is -- I am guessing within a week or so), that would be it. See? I am open to suggestions ;) However, I am strongly against having Core get involved in how I run the KDE project. > I once again caution people from being rash and saying more than what > is meant. What is key here is us keeping focus on all our common > goals and to side-step (professionally) all matters that are hurdles > no matter how big/small they might seem to some. > > Salam and keep those heads cool and collected. > Those skulls (were they heads?) are sitting quietly in my closet and are getting cooler by the minute ;) Regards -- ------------------------------------------------------- | Mohammed Elzubeir | Visit us at: | | | http://www.arabeyes.org/ | | Arabeyes Project | Homepage: | | Unix the 'right' way | http://elzubeir.openius.com/| -------------------------------------------------------
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part