Re: [developers] Error in Simplified Naskh Font

[Hatem Nassrat <hnassrat at gmail dot com>]

On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 8:41 PM, Hamed al-Suhli <hamedsuhli at gmail dot com> wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 15, 2009 at 12:46 AM, Khaled Ezzughayyar <khaledez at live dot com> wrote:
>> I saw the Quranic glyph. there is no error. this is the way that it reached
>> us from Allah (swt).
>>
> that is not true, the glyphs of Othmanic Mushaf is not from ALLAH, but
> it's the way that Arabs of hijaz writing those days and they used it
> to write the first Mushaf.

Before making such an assumpion, I ask you one question. Where do you
get your information. You cannot here one or two words and jump to
conclusions. Do you know of the term "كتاب الوحي". Do you know who
"أبي بن كعب", "زيد بن ثابت", "معاذ بن جبل" + the four Khulafa Al
Rashidin (and there are more) were, and their role while Prophet
Muhammed, may Allah's peace an blessings be upon him, was receiving
the Quran that was delivered through Sayedona Gebril عليه السلام.
Please do some research and ask a عالم قراّت on this subject. Do you
know that Prophet Muhammed, may Allah's peace an blessings be upon
him, was unlettered and couldn't read or write. From the sahih hadith
and serat al rasool, there are many incidents were the كتاب الوحي
differed on how should a word be written and they went back to the
Prophet Muhammed صلى الله عليه وسلم
الذي لا ينتق عن الهوى

> even there is Qalone Mushaf in Arabic Magreb which is defer than
> Othmanic Mushaf.

Please please ask a عالم قراّت to explain who "قالون" ,"ورش" ,"حمزى"
,"كساّئي" ... were and what are the "سبعة أحرف" and what the "قراّت"
are.

أي صواب فمن الله و أي خطء فمن نفسي

ليحني الله وإياكم الصراط المستقيم

-- 
Hatem Nassrat