On Mon, Dec 24, 2007 at 09:16:28AM +0200, moayyad sadi wrote:
> > > I'm thinking of a license just like GPL but the this extra term:
> > > * degrading authentication procedures IS NOT PERMITTED,
> > > inauthentic (or impure or inconsistent) software as defined by the
> > > original author or
> > > according to original software checking procedure (GPG) should always
> > > appear as impure or inconsistent in the derived work.
> >
> > This won't be a free license as soon as some kind of modification is
> > prohibited. It is the same with limitation of use ("legal").
> >
> it's not prohibited because "appear as impure or inconsistent in the
> derived work."
> does not mean not allowed to be distributed
>
> so it's free because it's only about assurance of consistency
> and because I added another term that ALLOW distributing
> inauthentic/impure/... software
> it's only a mark, but moved from changelog to the title
I'd ask on debian legal.
--
GPG-Key: 0xA3FD0DF7 - 9F73 032E EAC9 F7AD 951F 280E CB66 8E29 A3FD 0DF7
Debian User and Developer.
Homepage: www.foolab.org
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature