[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Arabic spellchecker



Well.... you do see it without a Hamza in many cases, as if it is ok. As if it is not wrong. I am not sure. But I do write it with a Hamza! 



Hussam Al-Mulhim
Gradute Assistant
Mobile +966 504 812912
Home Telephone +966 3 860 5283
College of Industrial Management
P.O.Box 1039
Dhahran KFUPM 31261
Saudi Arabia
email hussam at kfupm dot edu dot sa
HomePage http://faculty.kfupm.edu.sa/MISAC/hussam/
 

-----Original Message-----
From: developer-bounces at arabeyes dot org [mailto:developer-bounces at arabeyes dot org] On Behalf Of arn at scs-net dot org
Sent: Saturday, November 19, 2005 1:47 PM
To: Development Discussions
Subject: RE: Arabic spellchecker

Is it a general rule ? in this case, I solved my problem of Al... Thanks a lot
Regards
Armelle

Quoting ÍÓÇã <hussam at kfupm dot edu dot sa>:

> Almanya should have a Hamza over the Alef!
> 
> 
> Hussam Al-Mulhim
> Gradute Assistant
> Mobile +966 504 812912
> Home Telephone +966 3 860 5283
> College of Industrial Management
> P.O.Box 1039
> Dhahran KFUPM 31261
> Saudi Arabia
> email hussam at kfupm dot edu dot sa
> HomePage http://faculty.kfupm.edu.sa/MISAC/hussam/
>  
> -----Original Message-----
> From: developer-bounces at arabeyes dot org [mailto:developer-bounces at arabeyes dot org]
> On Behalf Of arn at scs-net dot org
> Sent: Saturday, November 19, 2005 1:16 PM
> To: Development Discussions
> Subject: Re: Arabic spellchecker
> 
> I'm interrested by your approach. I'm working on arabization of a library
> software and one of my problem is to deal with article. I need to know when
> an
> Al is an article (so as to sort title without article) or when it's part of
> a
> word. I think you have this kind of problem with dictionnary. The only
> solution
> I saw right now is to have a list of the word beginning with al so as to
> sort
> Almania with alef and Al chams with Ch. Do you think this is a good way to
> start ?
> Regards
> Armelle
> 
> Quoting Ahmad Khalifa <ahmad at khalifa dot ws>:
> 
> > arn at scs-net dot org wrote:
> > > Question of a beginner in arabic. I feel that the idea of AFFIX or
> suffix
> > is
> > > more related to latin language. Would it not be possible to work with
> > those
> > > forms that are (as I feel) the basic of arabic. I remember trying to
> learn
> > of
> > > the first, second form, and those faaEl faEl....  and so on. But of
> course
> > that
> > > may seems easier when you're a beginner.
> > 
> > Everything is possible.
> > But consider these questions.
> > 
> > - Would the AFFIX approach not work ?
> > - Which one is easier to implement ?
> > - Which one is faster to implement ?
> > - Which one will be easier to add to OO.o ?
> > - Which one will have wider deployment and acceptance ?
> > 
> > To me, the answer of these questions is what makes me go with the
> > AFFIX approach.
> > 
> > -- 
> > Salam,
> > Ahmad Khalifa
> > 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>