[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: minibidi bug
- To: Development Discussions <developer at arabeyes dot org>
- Subject: Re: minibidi bug
- From: Behdad Esfahbod <behdad at cs dot toronto dot edu>
- Date: Sat, 28 May 2005 19:27:59 -0400 (EDT)
On Sat, 28 May 2005, Ahmad Khalifa wrote:
> Behdad Esfahbod wrote:
> > That shouldn't really matter. I can't get your code working.
> > Can you paste the whole resolved levels?
>
> Well yes it does matter. the missing level '3' makes miniBidi miss
> 1 of the reverses needed.
No. AFAICS, the problem is with bidi type of the text after
"best ". The '3' shouldn't matter. Since 4 >= 3 anyway.
> I cant really get to my linux machine now (as its 2:00 am) here
> but I'll give you the levels tomorow.
>
> In the meantime you can...
>
> Quoting miniBidi's README
> > To run the tests,
> >
> > goto minibidi.c at line 38
> > comment "#define GetType(x) getType(x)" and
> > uncomment "#define GetType(x) getCAPRtl(x)"
> > this makes miniBidi use the CAPRtl charset used for testing
> >
> > then run,
> > $ gcc testrun.c -o mini
> > $ ./mini
>
> I used
> $ gcc -g testrun.c -o mini
> so I can run...
> $ ddd mini
>
> There is no -verbose in testrun.c so you'll have to use ddd and debug :)
Oh, thanks. In the time to debug that with no verbose, I guess I
can go on and make a FriBidi release ;).
> ak.
--behdad
http://behdad.org/