On Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 01:55:39AM +0100, Michelle Konzack wrote: > Am 2005-03-10 00:51:02, schrieb Mohammed Sameer: > > > Is this woody ? or sarge ?? > > I have tried it to compile under WOODY. I think, there is a > missing dependencie, but I have already installed some with > 'apt-get build-dep katoob' > hmmmmmmm, My home server isn't up and running as I'm reinstalling it. So I don't have an access to a woody box to see. Why don't you use the woody packages I've built ? http://bignachos.com/~uniball/ > > BTW: I don't really know how is the po files handled in other > > projects ? Do you have any idea ?? > No, What I meant by the package maintainers and so. > Include it in your sources "/usr/share/locale/de/LC_MESSAGES/katoob.mo" > > And for the manpage I have send in "/usr/share/man/de/man1/katoob.1.gz" > Because I am working with you, you can put it directly into your > package. But there are some translation projects which include the > manpages in e.g. the package "manpages-de". > > Maybe wee should ask debian-mentors. > I don't think that a small package like this deserve a locale specific sub-package. I'll include it in the main deb. -- ---------------- -- Katoob Main Developer, Arabbix Maintainer. GNU/Linux registered user #224950 Proud Egyptian GNU/Linux User Group <www.eglug.org> Admin. Life powered by Debian, Homepage: www.foolab.org -- Don't send me any attachment in Micro$oft (.DOC, .PPT) format please Read http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html Preferable attachments: .PDF, .HTML, .TXT Thanx for adding this text to Your signature
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature