On Thu, Jan 20, 2005 at 11:17:06AM -0800, Nadim Shaikli wrote: > --- Alaa Abd El Fattah <alaa at eglug dot org> wrote: > > I've been operating on the assumption that gnome is a requirement, > > after talking to abdo on IRC I realized I don't remember if gnome > > is a requirement or not. > > We need to ban abdo from IRC :-) Seriously, I think most thought that > Gnome would be included sans thought. I would tend to think that this > is one of those modules that people can opt for instead of going for > Gnome. In other words, if a person opted to generate his/her spin-off > he/she should, as noted earlier, be able to do this with ease. > > Overall though, I think more people would opt for Gnome than KDE from > what I've heard/seen from this community. In reality this is not a > serious issue at this point :-) > What I understand from abdo is that KDE needs QA 1st, I'd like to have arabbix-kde and arabbix-gnome Let's start with gnome now, And later we can have another KDE iso after the QA. "main module, modularity ;-)" -- ---------------- -- Katoob Main Developer, Arabbix Maintainer. GNU/Linux registered user #224950 Proud Egyptian GNU/Linux User Group <www.eglug.org> Admin. Life powered by Debian, Homepage: www.foolab.org -- Don't send me any attachment in Micro$oft (.DOC, .PPT) format please Read http://www.fsf.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html Preferable attachments: .PDF, .HTML, .TXT Thanx for adding this text to Your signature
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature