[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Arabbix's which distro to work with



On Thu, Jan 20, 2005 at 11:17:06AM -0800, Nadim Shaikli wrote:
> --- Alaa Abd El Fattah <alaa at eglug dot org> wrote:
> > I've been operating on the assumption that gnome is a requirement,
> > after talking to abdo on IRC I realized I don't remember if gnome
> > is a requirement or not.
> 
> We need to ban abdo from IRC :-)  Seriously, I think most thought that
> Gnome would be included sans thought.  I would tend to think that this
> is one of those modules that people can opt for instead of going for
> Gnome.  In other words, if a person opted to generate his/her spin-off
> he/she should, as noted earlier, be able to do this with ease.
> 
> Overall though, I think more people would opt for Gnome than KDE from
> what I've heard/seen from this community.  In reality this is not a
> serious issue at this point :-)
> 

What I understand from abdo is that KDE needs QA 1st, I'd like to have arabbix-kde and arabbix-gnome
Let's start with gnome now, And later we can have another KDE iso after the QA.
"main module, modularity ;-)"

-- 
----------------
-- Katoob Main Developer, Arabbix Maintainer.
GNU/Linux registered user #224950
Proud Egyptian GNU/Linux User Group <www.eglug.org> Admin.
Life powered by Debian, Homepage: www.foolab.org
--
Don't send me any attachment in Micro$oft (.DOC, .PPT) format please
Read http://www.fsf.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html
Preferable attachments: .PDF, .HTML, .TXT
Thanx for adding this text to Your signature

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature