[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Fwd: Re: CUPS Arabic support ?]

I think it is Behdad's turn to answer this question :).

Behdad what do you think ? and how can we accomodate CUPS. Please note that since BIDI is a fundemental tool for adapting Arabic, Persian and Hebrew it is important that we address this matter permenantly so we can go after more projects and more applications.

Thanks

Anmar

Ahmad Khalifa wrote: 


here is the reply...
whats next ??


ak.

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: CUPS Arabic support ?
Date: Sun, 23 May 2004 17:59:26 -0400
From: Michael Sweet <
Organization: Easy Software Products
Newsgroups: cups.development

Ahmad Khalifa wrote:



Michael Sweet wrote:

It is not a technical issue, but a legal one.  Any core code in
CUPS MUST be owned by us or available under an unrestrictive license
(i.e. BSD-style) since we relicense the code under other licenses
(such as the one that Apple uses, although there are other companies
licensing the code as well)

Also, depending on an ALPHA-quality piece of software
for a core part of CUPS printing is also something we do not want to
do.

In short, in order for us to accept your patch, it must be
unencumbered and not depend upon a third-party library that cannot
be included in the CUPS source code.




ok, what about LGPL ?
you can do whatever you want with it.



Not exactly.  There is an implied requirement that in order to
comply with the LGPL you need to link dynamically to the library
or provide source.  Also, you can't re-license the code under
different terms, which is a requirement for us for any core code
that we use - the licensee might be shipping on an embedded
platform where source and shared libaries are simply not possible.

here is what FriBidi's author had to say..

behdad esfahbod wrote:
Since FriBidi is LGPLed, there should be absolutely no problem
with relicensing CUPS.  That's why FriBidi is LGPLed.
Technically, even Microsoft can ship FriBidi in Windows with no
licensing problem as long as they don't touch the code.  Even if
they touch the code, all they need to do is to give the modified
source code of FriBidi too, but nothing else.



That's not our interpretation - shared libraries/DLLs allow for
this, but as long as there is no statement allowing for static
linking (such as that provided by FLTK - http://www.fltk.org/)
you can't link it statically without providing source, and that
makes it impossible for us to use it for a core part of CUPS.

_______________________________________________
Developer mailing list
Developer at arabeyes dot org
http://lists.arabeyes.org/mailman/listinfo/developer