[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [emacs-bidi] Re: emacs-bidi - funtional/ready, now what ?
- To: eliz at elta dot co dot il
- Subject: Re: [emacs-bidi] Re: emacs-bidi - funtional/ready, now what ?
- From: TAKAHASHI Naoto <ntakahas at m17n dot org>
- Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2003 11:55:50 +0900 (JST)
- Cc: shaikli at yahoo dot com, developer at arabeyes dot org, emacs-bidi at gnu dot org
- User-agent: SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya) FLIM/1.14.2 (Yagi-Nishiguchi) APEL/10.2 Emacs/21.2 (sparc-sun-solaris2.8) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI)
Thank you for your explanation, Eli.
"Eli Zaretskii" writes:
>> > Has RMS or the emacs developers given a clear statement on what it
>> > is that they'd like to see or not (URL) ? Is there a means for us
>> > to elevate Bidi's inclusion on their list of things to do ?
>>
>> I do not think any URL is available for now. If someone writes a
>> summary, I can put it one the emacs-bidi web page.
> I wrote such summaries a few times in the past, see the archives.
Oh, yes, of course ML archives are available. I was thinking of a web
page specially designed to explain "why is Emacs bidi-illiterate?"
> P.S. Btw, I didn't see the original messages from Nadim Shaikli, and
> neither did I see the message from Alex to which you replied in
> another mail. These messages are also not in the emacs-bidi archives.
> Does someone know what happened with them? Did they bounce off the
> list or something?
Strange. Does the emacs-bidi list reject posts from non-members? Are
Nadim and Alex on the list?
--
TAKAHASHI Naoto
ntakahas at m17n dot org
http://www.m17n.org/ntakahas/