Re: Quranic Proposal

[Nadim Shaikli <shaikli at yahoo dot com>]

--- Thomas Milo <t dot milo at chello dot nl> wrote:
> > Sure we understand that and that's preciously why we wanted to make sure
> > the proposal's content and reasoning was stated clearly using "unicode"
> > terms and nomenclature.
> 
> How about rewriting it together and making it a joint proposal to the
> Unicode consortium. I have already a lot of work invested in the same
> subject and solved most of the Unicode problems that you mention.

Sure, I see no problem in that at all (I actually think it will make the
proposal stronger and more complete with multiple minds working on it).
I do want to continue maintaining the doc though, so once things are
agreed-upon and text is drafted and/or modified - simply mail me (or
this list) the new content for me to collect it all and re-present it
in a new document.

PS: I can't speak for Mohammed.Yousif, but I've known him to be a very
    reasonable proactive results-oriented person (ie. don't expect any
    contrary opinion to what's stated here).

Regards,

 - Nadim



	
		
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Friends.  Fun.  Try the all-new Yahoo! Messenger.
http://messenger.yahoo.com/