[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Prayer Times C code ported to Java
- To: Development Discussions <developer at arabeyes dot org>
- Subject: Re: Prayer Times C code ported to Java
- From: Moazzam Khan <moazzamk at gmail dot com>
- Date: Sun, 19 Dec 2004 11:54:43 -0600
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=ITqdnJuGshtKAlXsvonzmVqWZxCK4P802+tVK6JqMT/XkNZTcs7m3A8+CM12mfgti9l1XtLswr9nKttOuJq40K9VpfmWjlNXu/2g5Qq84CjccT5pxXQ9tpxarcv5OFYIFiOII55JfVc1q3SEsL7R/7nseU9nT+M0fc08sgwyh04=
Hi,
After Nadim's email on how "phantom bugs" can creep in if two
repositories hold the code to JPrayer (and I agree with it), I thought
I will let it stay at mpadc's repository since it is already there.
JPrayer is adhan application I wrote.
I agree with Nadeem on colaboration. Just because JPrayer is in
mpadc.com's repository does not mean that people from arabeyes.org
cannot work on it : ). We can make a better application together than
we can make alone (and save loads of time). Since Ahmad has already
ported the code natively to Java, may be that can be used to in
JPrayer till changes are made in ITL repository for prayertime. It
will also make JPrayer more portable (for mobile phones, Windows,
etc).
Let me know if you are interested in working with me Ahmad.
Regards,
Moazzam Khan
On Sun, 19 Dec 2004 00:24:09 -0800 (PST), Nadim Shaikli
<shaikli at yahoo dot com> wrote:
> --- Ahmed Talaat <aa_talaat at yahoo dot com> wrote:
> > I ported and tested the C code of the prayer time program (ITL) to Java, and
> > would like to avail it publicly for others to make use of it. Please advise
> > how to do that.
>
> Mr. Moazzam Khan has gone down the same route and unfortunately we still
> don't have anything to show for it in our CVS repository. Please follow
> this thread [1] to come up to speed on what was suggested. I'm unsure to
> what final decision was made and whether Mr. Khan's work will in fact find
> its way back to the ITL tree.
>
> BTW: It might be best for all interested in Java and ITL to simply
> collaborate together to further extend the application's reach
> as opposed to each going their separate route.
>
> [1] http://lists.arabeyes.org/archives/developer/2004/December/msg00006.html
>
> Salam.
>
> - Nadim
>
>
> __________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Dress up your holiday email, Hollywood style. Learn more.
> http://celebrity.mail.yahoo.com
> _______________________________________________
> Developer mailing list
> Developer at arabeyes dot org
> http://lists.arabeyes.org/mailman/listinfo/developer
>