[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Certifying the Quran data files.
- To: General Arabization Discussion <general at arabeyes dot org>
- Subject: Re: Certifying the Quran data files.
- From: Kamal Mugahid <binmugahid at gmail dot com>
- Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2005 14:33:03 +0400
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=sLF1dt5ajJ/6PR3CzZ4I4fCOz6c8fTMFplGCe7ReYt+h38ZxHFGWuSXJJ2jbotGOWubBpVgImM4cb2/xCuv7UCZ9AlrIbCUa4hHEoLMrh+wjafG8b9hrQ2qw59KMy4CdKeY8AcHkuifFzumfY9NmuXbRSw8kMfzRp10rth4fxJU=
Alsalamu Alikum
I think the issue here guys is that somebody needs to read text and
compare it to a Mushaf.
Usually, Certified readers do that, but since we don't know any with
Linux experience, the easiest way is to hand this over to somebody who
will take responsibility in saying that he compared every letter of
the mashaf with what is on Quraan Software and authenticate it. This
is a task that takes no more than a month at worst.
For the Record: Certification is comparing the text the way it is
rendered on the software end with the Mushaf, letter by letter,
including tashkeel and the other punctuations.
I could help in that area Ya mahammad. Let me know if you want me to
certify the text renditions and I will get on it.
Kamal
On Wed, 16 Feb 2005 11:46:13 +0200, Mohammed Sameer <msameer at foolab dot org> wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 15, 2005 at 10:07:31PM -0800, Nadim Shaikli wrote:
> > --- Mohammed Sameer <msameer at foolab dot org> wrote:
> > > During my trip to India I met someone and he offered help certifying the
> > > Quran data files
> > > through his contacts with the Islamic authorities in Pakistan.
> > > He is asking for the data files, I'm not sure that sending them as XML is the
> > > right thing.
> > > What do you think ?
> >
> > We really need to talk to M.Yousif to get his status on where the files
> > are and whether we are ready for that step. I am also unsure as to what
> > they would certify per se (hopefully not the files themselves as opposed
> > to the raw unformatted text) and what if the XML format or some of the
> > tags needed to be changed, etc - does that mean we'd have to do through
> > the procedure again ? This also brings up the question of how to guarantee
> > data integrity, etc, etc.
> >
>
> I'm sorry, I asked the guy to stall it, I'm out of this issue.
> I'm offering something, And as usual the time is wasted in endless ,eaningless discussions.
>
> PERIOD.
>
> --
> ----------------
> -- Katoob Main Developer, Arabbix Maintainer.
> GNU/Linux registered user #224950
> Proud Egyptian GNU/Linux User Group <www.eglug.org> Admin.
> Life powered by Debian, Homepage: www.foolab.org
> --
> Don't send me any attachment in Micro$oft (.DOC, .PPT) format please
> Read http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html
> Preferable attachments: .PDF, .HTML, .TXT
> Thanx for adding this text to Your signature
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> General mailing list
> General at arabeyes dot org
> http://lists.arabeyes.org/mailman/listinfo/general
>
>
--
Kamal Mugahid Elzain