Re: Tanween variants and Unicode

["Mete Kural" <metek at touchtonecorp dot com>]

Hi Gregg,

From: Gregg Reynolds <gar at arabink dot com>
>For sukun I can definitely imagine somebody wanting to place it above a 
>tanween mark.

Can you please exemplify?

>> This canonical equivalence of fathatan with fatha+fatha, etc. is
>> personally not very important for me. This is one of the things Tom
>> wants to propose and feels strongly about. At this point I haven't
>> comprehended the real importance for this canonical equivalence so I
>> would suggest you direct your questions about this one to Tom.
>> 
>Ok.  Who's Tom?  Do you mean Thomas Milo?

Yes, Thomas Milo.

Regards,
Mete

--
Mete Kural
Touchtone Corporation
714-755-2810
--