[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Arabic fonts will be accpeted in to gnome!
- To: General Arabization Discussion <general at arabeyes dot org>
- Subject: Re: Arabic fonts will be accpeted in to gnome!
- From: Youcef Rabah Rahal <rahal at arabeyes dot org>
- Date: Sun, 6 Jun 2004 13:37:16 +0200
- Organization: Arabeyes
- User-agent: KMail/1.6.1
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Sunday 06 June 2004 11:29, Arafat Medini wrote:
> في ح, 2004-06-06 السّاعة 09:04 +0200, Youcef Rabah Rahal كتب:
> take a look at this screenshot:
>
> http://www.silverpen.de/fonts2.png
Hehe... Now I'm famous ;)
> As you can see:
>
> +the Arabic Kacst fonts are an indirect rip of bitstream cyberbit! So no
> real innovation here.
> +They lack contrast, and don't have natural design.
> in every font at least one letter is not good.
> +They are too linear not smoot like tahoma for eg. so they hurt they
> eyes, especially if you'll use them in everyday life.
> +The only font that looks promising is KacstQura but it has major
> problem with resizing.(kacstQura at 9 pts)
> +I am for a fast solution, and as long as I can see Arabic with these
> fonts they are for me Arabic fonts, technology is technology there isn't
> Arabic or persian technology as long as the output is the same.
I'm not talking about the technology ! I'm talking about the style: as you
know, style differ for Arabic/Persian/Urdu/... when it comes to the visual
display of the letters. Anyway, these Persian fonts seem fine to me (ie
readable with my Arab's eyes ;)
> > If not, we should then suggest to add Arabic fonts (khotot) _and_ Persian
> > ones.
>
> we can't there is only one fonts called bitstream cyberbit, and the
> fonts will be maybe included in it, so at the end only one font will be
> chosen, as if you start tahoma and you only have one Arabic font. But
> maybe the fonts will be destributed separately in this case I am
> naturally in fvour of some Kacst fonts BUT they are still not good
> enough, and who works wins...
I'm talking about Khotot ones not KACST
http://www.arabeyes.org/project.php?proj=Khotot
There is a wide choice of styles among these fonts and they're quite nice
(except for the Latin chars which are now... well, 'ugly' ;). You should take
a look at them.
Anyway, you take the full responsability of your declarations about KACST
fonts :-))
Salam,
- --
Youcef R. Rahal
Arabeyes.org
http://www.arabeyes.org/~rahal
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFAwwHsHDRR6Cd0eSYRAmIzAJ9PFxy71se0LtlS9UlWPQ1LnHEy8wCfSgvg
CRyvuzMoaBs16tsxk5uSq8k=
=muf9
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----