My Inbox Happily Received This From Mohammed Yousif @ Sat, 9 Nov 2002 16:06:17 +0200 > On Thursday 07 November 2002 17:40, Mohammed Sameer wrote: > > I wish to see the day that a Qt application is compiled without problems, > > specially those produced by kdevelop or Qt designer ;) > If you don't set QTDIR, then don't blame Qt for producing errors , If SuSE > didn't build Qt properly , you can bug them, but you can't say > that Qt is full of problems (if we are to think that way, then gtk has > problems too because it refuses to compile without its headers) read my comment "> > specially those produced by kdevelop or Qt designer ;)" What do you say that i had to set "QTDIR" inside the Makefile in the first version of abgad ? who mentioned SuSE here ? anyway i don't say Qt is bad, i don't like it nor i do like KDE. "AND that doesn't mean they are bad, just not to start a war!!!!!" > Please have a look at the Qt api , it's the cleanest and most organized thing > I've ever seen in my whole life, and this is the reason why I prefer it to > other toolkits. Yes i had a look, didn't understand them as i did understand Gtk. it's a personal opinion though > btw: I read the an email you wrote before, you mentioned that kde programs > consumes more time to compile than gnome pograms, this is not because gnome > is better than kde but this is because gnu c compiler is faster that gnu c++ > compiler AFAIK (most kde apps are c++ while most gnome apps are c) that's applied too to ghtmm. "matez3alsh ya sedy :-)" that was in a reply for Unixy, he was saying that gnome is bad, i said that kde is bad ;) hope this doesn't *poison* any thing between us ?! -- ---------------- -- Katoob Main Developer Linux registered user # 224950 ICQ # 58475622 With Great Power, Comes Great Responsibilities.
Attachment:
pgp00005.pgp
Description: PGP signature