[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Fwd: [Bug 79398] Changed - RFE adding multilingual-arabic text editor
- To: general at arabeyes dot org
- Subject: Fwd: [Bug 79398] Changed - RFE adding multilingual-arabic text editor
- From: Mohamed Eldesoky <arabi at hotpop dot com>
- Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2002 13:29:33 +0200
- User-agent: KMail/1.4.3
---------- Forwarded Message ----------
Subject: [Bug 79398] Changed - RFE adding multilingual-arabic text editor
Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2002 06:16:23 -0500
From: bugzilla at redhat dot com
To: notting at redhat dot com, m dot eldesoky at tedata dot net, borgan at redhat dot com
Cc: mharris at redhat dot com
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug
report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79398
--- shadow/79398 Thu Dec 12 02:25:43 2002
+++ shadow/79398.tmp.4565 Thu Dec 12 06:16:23 2002
@@ -58,3 +58,16 @@
They haven't been born as standard, and yes, Katoob is now the standard
arabic text editor.
I wish if you reconsider your decision.
+
+------- Additional comments from menthos at menthos dot com 2002-12-12 06:16:15
------- +I guess by standard editors is meant those editors that are already
included by +default in the desktop environments (like gedit and kedit) and
other editors +already included in the distribution (like emacs and vim).
+
+I wouldn't put too much hope in the developer's reconsidering this decision.
I +haven't seen any motive on why these features have to be developed in a
seperate +editor, and why any of the standard editors couldn't be extended
with these +features instead.
+The features of this editor are probably very useful, but I don't see why
there +should have to be YAE (Yet Another Editor) for it included in the
distribution. +I don't think the problem is too few editors, it's rather the
opposite. :-)
-------------------------------------------------------