[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Mozilla status (June)



--- Ayman Hourieh <aymanh at gmail dot com> wrote:
> On 6/3/05, Abdulaziz Al-Arfaj <aalarfaj at gmail dot com> wrote:
> > 
> > My memory fails me and I think you answered this question before, but
> > why is the locale ar-JO instead of ar?
> 
> This is how it works on Mozilla's side [1], you need the language and
> country code, I chose JO because this is what was used for the
> previously contributed localizations.

Can we include all the other countries as well ?  It would be best to
simply have 'ar' (or 'ar-*' or 'ar-XX') if possible else I think we need
to include all the countries.  I realize that this is a bigger locale issue,
but with 98% of the data between these various countries being shared I
think we ought to suggest to someone (beyond mozilla even) that if I pick
say 'ar-IQ' and it's not there then any 'ar-*' ought to do.

Keep up the GREAT work and congratulations on finally "getting in" :-)
and thank you for the status report.

 - Nadim


		
__________________________________ 
Discover Yahoo! 
Get on-the-go sports scores, stock quotes, news and more. Check it out! 
http://discover.yahoo.com/mobile.html