[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Mozilla status (June)
- To: Documentation and Translation <doc at arabeyes dot org>
- Subject: Re: Mozilla status (June)
- From: Abdulaziz Al-Arfaj <aalarfaj at gmail dot com>
- Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2005 20:05:39 +0300
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=Q4RVWWfcMywba16mA06Jfuj6NxFydIGoSPXMEY338ggVZWNlIoERK1JZdtZAJmN38mHBn3yvSL4k5689mp4gXXsaDajcxMTcuFnySihkb4XdNk4a8rV8m5O24e9mK8dXPIydqGAKZ5T0rwuyIZqv13NwyzaRbdamz7mXyvgkNgg=
On 6/3/05, Ayman Hourieh <aymanh at gmail dot com> wrote:
[...]
>
> This is what I can think of.
>
> [1] http://lxr.mozilla.org/l10n-aviarybranch/source/browser/locales/ar-JO/
> [2] http://wiki.mozilla.org/L10n:Firefox_1.0.x_Status#Arabic_.28ar-JO.29
My memory fails me and I think you answered this question before, but
why is the locale ar-JO instead of ar?
Abdulaziz,