[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Consensus on QAC
- To: Documentation and Translation <doc at arabeyes dot org>
- Subject: Re: Consensus on QAC
- From: Ayman Hourieh <aymanh at gmail dot com>
- Date: Mon, 3 Jan 2005 22:44:47 +0200
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=pteesLy+v7tmgh5JgwL5eck/XPAg080owjHcvFNm9M/1vGVWH9oukHeRwjmmN77Ezrtcq4wf9asFQgZA3dpSXzNAyY8MoagBgBCEJhGYXB8gq36bEAPpZBf1gt7GhTBwSpPJEgRMlzCh30ZMr0zvbVScUyrXRrwwgPvoawTu0Qw=
Salam,
Sent an email to the kde-es mailing list, which doesn't seem to have a
public archive (only registered users), covering all the points
mentioned here, waiting for a reply now.
-Ayman
On Sun, 2 Jan 2005 14:22:16 -0800 (PST), Nadim Shaikli
<shaikli at yahoo dot com> wrote:
> [...]
> It doesn't matter what format they'd be willing to give us the data
> in as long as they're willing to share it and give us a GPL-like
> license on it. Whatever format they decide is good enough - let
> this be a non-issue.
> [...]