[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Shells with IRC (was: gnome "somewhat" status report)
- To: Documentation and Translation <doc at arabeyes dot org>
- Subject: Re: Shells with IRC (was: gnome "somewhat" status report)
- From: Ayman Hourieh <aymanh at gmail dot com>
- Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2004 14:38:51 +0200
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=mW2kGYAwOzIdWLUAuxjkQFScWd0AWc/niFE1dYgIOyM8QB7LMyiN8e9pG/iEBAzE6FULWHq1aAU9wpAR/RpjCA/iDYfPE6zDAzjeacoRUr/3S8Lpr55PkPy19ZbL2TDQCFofuVWIY52WTDZC3EeDaQyvRJ7rNRg2WpZz4XwLkv4=
Thanks for your efforts :)
That service looks good, I think I'll go buy a postcard and send it,
but it will take a while before he receives it.
Is it OK if we use Jabber? The protocol is open, and there's a lot of
clients for all kinds of platforms [0], many clients say that HTTP
proxies are supported, I'm downloading Gabber now to test it.
Salam & Eid mubarak.
Ayman
[0] http://www.jabber.org/software/clients.php
On Sun, 14 Nov 2004 13:23:46 -0800 (PST), Abdulaziz Al-Arfaj
<alarfaj0 at yahoo dot com> wrote:
> Most external shells don't allow IRC for very good reasons. The ones that do
> have a longer and more complicated registration process. This fellow:
>
> http://www.nic-nac-project.de
>
> has the best set of services I've found anywhere. The catch is you have to send
> him a postcard to Germany before he activates your account. I found that it's
> well worth it.
>
> Eid Mubarak
>
> Abdulaziz,
>