On Sun, 2004-08-01 at 15:12, Abdulaziz Al-Arfaj wrote: > Not sure what AIG is but count me in. I dont think we need > authorization from core as much as we need authorization from the other > QAC members. > > In fact this sounds like something that should be done under the > umbrella of the QAC, but since there's no need for all six of us to be > working on this, I guess we can have 2 or 3 people do it now, and then > get QAC to approve it later. > The proposed BIG (not AIG, Bidi Interface Guidelines) came up during the Arabeyes Evolution Party [1]. It doesn't really have to do much with QAC (as QAC is more concerned with the quality of translation and not the user interface). I don't see why core would need to authorize anything. Simply get cracking, get a consent on it through discussions on the lists and move on. Reference: [1] http://wiki.arabeyes.org/EvolutionIrc2004 Regards -- ------------------------------------------------------- | Mohammed Elzubeir | Visit us at: | | | http://www.arabeyes.org/ | | Arabeyes Project | Homepage: | | Unix the 'right' way | http://elzubeir.fakkir.net/ | -------------------------------------------------------
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part