[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [developers] ITL
- To: Development Discussions <developer at arabeyes dot org>
- Subject: Re: [developers] ITL
- From: Khaled Hosny <khaledhosny at eglug dot org>
- Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2009 18:54:28 +0200
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:sender:date:from:to:subject :message-id:references:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition :in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=EygypAD/gg5Z8sVuf4T7whRaHr8F902Ev3UAADiF7y0=; b=o7OUdtqJTBwofuutgjbm8w2iCgKa+AjwL+1EMMMDfIuysrOurH2dR/7ffSHyGG5d9V xznLPVap/6ebHEB+7EJmU+IhsB1NZIeIEnCKEX1/yGlOySa72tmI/b3qqDThtY3ckKH7 B3JlychsOGYpzgYD5+DeCP0WeynzjFtpt+Q78=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:date:from:to:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=gVpO/mG5X0kK2Ytua+39t7dpESyZWNUUszjoQQgrfjljoxlt/Sy7r3TZnUdFZGddKW xn+Rec0LrSJSGJnPcjaD3rN9eZfpg3zCUPqAlu+qr3IHexdoOSyE1QScyCk3Ie0I8iJ/ E4tqQbFL4tbs9GQQES3vGCsTfJbcceuRdVUuU=
- User-agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)
On Mon, Mar 02, 2009 at 11:51:25AM -0400, Hatem Nassrat wrote:
> I am looking to port ITL over to python. Actually I will probably just
> wrap the C code as libraries in python. Any pointers or points to
> consider.
>
> Is the ITL code stable w.r.t. known bugs? or are there known bugs that
> are yet to be looked at?
AFAIK, the code is stable and nobody is working on it currently, however
some people reported severe miscalculations in extreme areas. Also the
used algorithms aren't documented.
See http://djihed.com/minbar/minbar-prayer-calculation-algorithms for
more information.
Hope this helps.
Regards,
Khaled
--
Khaled Hosny
Arabic localiser and member of Arabeyes.org team
Free font developer
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature