[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Fwd: Re: CUPS Arabic support ?]
- To: "Development Discussions" <developer at arabeyes dot org>
- Subject: Re: [Fwd: Re: CUPS Arabic support ?]
- From: "Anmar Oueja" <anmar at canada dot com>
- Date: Mon, 24 May 2004 22:22:28 -0700 (PDT)
- Cc: "Development Discussions" <developer at arabeyes dot org>
- User-agent: SquirrelMail/1.5.0
Hello All:
this is a very valid argument. How can CUPS use Glibc, which is LGPL, and
can't use Fribidi, which is also LGPL ?
Please find an answer to this.
Anmar
>
> FriBidi is not going to change license. If that happen someday,
> it would become GPLed. So, forget about it. But the problem is
> that they keep saying "you can't re-license the code under
> different terms, which is a requirement for us for any core code
> that we use", what does "core code" mean here? FriBidi is a
> library they can use, just like they use libc!
>
> Feel free to forget about using FriBidi. I will write in detail
> about this later.
>
> behdad
>
> PS. One last note, No, people don't know about licenses
> typically. Every single individual has his own idea about what
> GPL and LGPL mean... BTW, I'm still looking for the adequate
> answer in the FSF community for the case that shared libraries
> are technically impossible on a platform.
>
>
> On Mon, 24 May 2004, Ahmad Khalifa wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> > From: Michael Sweet <>
>> > Not exactly. There is an implied requirement that in order to
>> > comply with the LGPL you need to link dynamically to the library
>> > or provide source. Also, you can't re-license the code under
>> > different terms, which is a requirement for us for any core code
>> > that we use - the licensee might be shipping on an embedded
>> > platform where source and shared libaries are simply not possible.
>>
>> > That's not our interpretation - shared libraries/DLLs allow for
>> > this, but as long as there is no statement allowing for static
>> > linking (such as that provided by FLTK - http://www.fltk.org/)
>> > you can't link it statically without providing source, and that
>> > makes it impossible for us to use it for a core part of CUPS.
>>
>> he obviously knows about licences so,
>> please give me a reply to this. or simply relicense FriBidi under
>> BSD licence or similar.
>>
>> feel free to post to the Newsgroup yourself, you can
>> use this form,
>> http://www.cups.org/newsgroups.php?gcups.development+Gcups
>>
>> or a newsreader like mozilla's
>> nntp://news.easysw.com
>>
>>
>> ak.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Developer mailing list
>> Developer at arabeyes dot org
>> http://lists.arabeyes.org/mailman/listinfo/developer
>>
>>
>
> --behdad
> behdad.org
> _______________________________________________
> Developer mailing list
> Developer at arabeyes dot org
> http://lists.arabeyes.org/mailman/listinfo/developer
>