On Thu, Mar 25, 2004 at 01:04:39PM +0700, Mohammad DAMT wrote:
> On Sel, 2004-03-23 at 06:40, Mohammed Sameer wrote:
>
> > no problem from my side, I'll find free time to look at the code, and
> > it'll have a more intelligent algorithm ISA.
>
> is it GO or NO GO for this project ("Transliterated Arabic Input
> Method")?
>
I'm just stating my opinion here:
I don't think that turning it to an input method is the best idea ;)
I don't know how input methods work, but we may need to interprete 2
characters and turn them into 1 arabic letter, I don't think this'll
be possible with input methods.
And we are not really directly translating a -> alef, b --> beh,
..........
there should be a smart way, untill we standardise it, I think the
input method won't be nice now!
--
----------------
-- Katoob Main Developer
Linux registered user #224950, ICQ #58475622
--
Don't send me any attachment in Micro$oft (.DOC, .PPT) format please
Read http://www.fsf.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html
Preferable attachments: .PDF, .HTML, .TXT
Thanx for adding this text to Your signature
--
-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.1
GCM/IT d-(++)@ s+(++):->+++ a-- C+++$>++++ UL+++$>++++ P+++$>+++++
L+++(++++)$>+++++ E>+++ W++?>$ N+>+++ o? K-? !w++ !O !M !V !PS@ !PE@ Y+ PGP=+++
t? 5? !X R? tv-- b+@ DI D+ G-- e++>+++ h-->++ !r y?
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
Attachment:
pgp00012.pgp
Description: PGP signature