<embedded reply> <snips> My Inbox Happily Received This From Han Boetes @ Sun, 6 Oct 2002 05:28:55 +0200 > Mohammed Sameer (Uniball at gmx dot net) wrote: > > > thanks for offering > > attached the spec file > > i'm sure that it'll work fine on 9.0 but i don't have any ideas > > about future versions > > Decent work. > thanks for info. > You forgot the BuildRequires: > thought they were not necessary ;) > [~]% rpm -q libgtk+-x11-2.0_0 > So the BuildRequires for gtk+2-devel would be: > > BuildRequires: gtk+2-devel >= 2.0.6 mm I'm afraid i didn't understand exactly those, though i do understand all the switches for rpm! > You can also apply the same trick to the specification of the > Requires: So that would make the spec more flexible to future > versions. If you know your app would also build fine with older > version you can choose something less specific. So the srpm can be > build on older releases. > i think it should build on all gtk 2.x but since mandrake is shipped with 2.06 and the spec is for mandrake 9.0 + i made it >= 2.0.6 > You could replace this section: > With: > done it. > You can look at /usr/lib/rpm/macros for further more specific macros. > > Last but not least: Use rpmlint -i to double tripple check for any > errors. > rpmlint -i W: katoob invalid-packager Mohammed Sameer W: katoob invalid-buildhost localhost.localdomain E: katoob no-signature i think those are because that i'm not a MandrakeSoft developer, this'll be fixed when a MandrakeSoft developer will rebuild it? W: katoob file-not-in-%lang /usr/share/locale/ar/LC_MESSAGES/katoob.mo W: katoob file-not-in-%lang /usr/share/locale/pl/LC_MESSAGES/katoob.mo didn't know how to handle this? btw: i've changed the release to 2mdk. attached the spec file -- ---------------- -- Katoob Main Developer Linux registered user # 224950 ICQ # 58475622 With Great Power, Comes Great Responsibilities.
Attachment:
mandrake.spec
Description: Binary data
Attachment:
pgp00002.pgp
Description: PGP signature